Week 5

Statistical Analysis of Urban Data

This week, we will discuss the unique features of geospatial data and the importance of considering the spatial structure of most urban data when conducting statistical analysis. We will then have our first introduction to individual-level GPS data, and will discuss different techniques to extract semantic meaning and quantitative behavioral measures from GPS observations.

In our first practical, we will build on our results from week 2 to create geodemographic classifications of urban areas using census data. In our second practical, we will transform raw individual-level GPS data into meaningful behavioral information: detecting stay-points, behavioral motifs, displacement lengths, and creating semantically-enriched mobility networks.

Prepare

đź“– Take a look at two contrasting approaches to characterizing urban behavior: (1) with spatial clustering of demographic variables from the census [1], and (2) using individual-level behavioral data [2]. Finally, re-visit a classic review of mobile phone data mining [3].

Participate

🖥️ Lecture 5-1 – Statistical Analysis of Urban Data

Perform

⌨️ Lab 5-1 – Statistical Analysis of Urban Data



Back to course schedule ⏎

References

[1]
C. G. Gale, A. D. Singleton, A. G. Bates, and P. A. Longley, “Creating the 2011 area classification for output areas (2011 OAC),” Journal of Spatial Information Science, vol. 2016, no. 12, pp. 1–27, 2016, doi: 10.5311/JOSIS.2016.12.232.
[2]
Y. Yang, A. Pentland, and E. Moro, “Identifying latent activity behaviors and lifestyles using mobility data to describe urban dynamics,” EPJ Data Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00390-w.
[3]
S. Jiang, G. A. Fiore, Y. Yang, J. Ferreira Jr, E. Frazzoli, and M. C. González, “A review of urban computing for mobile phone traces: Current methods, challenges and opportunities,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing, 2013, pp. 1–9.